Meeting Minutes - DEAS/Physics Department Safety
Safety Committee Meeting - 12:00noon - 1:00pm, Wednesday, May 13,
1998
1. Video - "Handling LN2"
The meeting was opened with the viewing of the instructional video
"Handling LN2". Of those present, half said they use LN2 and they do
not use face shields. Henry commented that he had never heard of
injuries caused by LN2 in the eyes. Despite this, anyone handling
LN2 should wear goggles/safety glasses and gloves (not latex!) to
prevent burns.
2. Follow-Up Lab Inspection Reports:
a) Lyman Labs:
123: all chemicals which were sitting out have been placed in
bottles and taken care of. 126: vacuum pump is not being used; sign
has been changed.
128: ground fault protection for the electrical outlet above sink
has been taken care of.
131: refrigerators are labeled.
134: brewing coffee in the lab needs to stop. Coffee maker must be
removed. Lenny reminded everyone not to bring food/drinks into lab
areas. Inspectors finding signs of drinks or food
will cite us.
b) McKay Labs:
1st Floor: No representative was present at the meeting. This is a
recurring problem.
3rd Floor: in 328-330, a tube on the floor has been covered; in 322,
gas cylinder has been moved.
3. Safety Seminar Series Update - (Lenny)
Lenny reported that the Safety Seminar series is over.
Fire drills and fire extinguisher training will happen in June as
follows (Ed Jackson will send out reminders):
June 2nd - Pierce, Cruft, Jefferson, Lyman
June 9th - McKay, ESL
In cases where someone needs a fire extinguisher installed, such as
Hoffman G28, Henry explained that the Harvard Fire Group can provide
this.
4. Safety Training - Are We Doing It Right?
Lenny addressed the issue of poor attendance at the seminars by
asking whether what we do is sufficient. With only one person
attending the Compressed Gas Seminar and noone attending the
Shipping Hazmats Seminar, Chemical Safety and Radiation Safety Talks,
it is a serious concern that we may not be reaching everyone. Over
400 people have attended the seminars since 1985. Are we
experiencing a cyclical dip because our energy for safety related
concerns has run out? Lenny suggested that we need to do something
different to increase our current attendance.
If some people are missing their training, why does Harvard have so
few accidents?
- Some suggest because we have smart students.
- Lab workers may be getting on-the-job training from experienced
co-workers. (This goes only so far. The training would be too
specific and narrow.)
In any case, these possible factors cannot be relied upon to create
trained staff and students. In fact, in the latter case, younger
inexperienced lab workers may actually learn bad habits from
experienced co-workers who have come to practice lax safety
procedures.
Possible solutions? The following suggestions were
offered:
- Henry suggested that it may only appear that Harvard has suffered
no ill-effects from poor safety training. Poor safety procedures may
be creating unseen long-term hazards. OSHA is very concerned about
this, and Harvard can expect to be more closely scrutinized. Every
incoming student needs safety training.
- Dr. Gold suggested that training taught by experienced peers would
be more effective. Lectures by professors or supervisors have a feel
of bureaucracy and may not be taken as seriously as a more "real"
peer training session that could include instructors who have
experienced accidents themselves.
- Training sessions need to be as efficient and concise as possible
to maintain interest. We also need to emphasize the retraining of
faculty as well.
- Individual policing to make sure everyone complies. Perhaps we
could install some sort of automatic checks to make sure a person has
been trained.
- Announce training sessions at lab meetings where everyone is
present. n It would be hard to enforce a mandatory training
requirement prior to working.
- Periodic "Training Day" - all work stops, all get trained. Can be
planned for in advance. Faculty would need to support this. Others
felt this idea might be too bureaucratic.
- LISTS: Peter Pershan felt that a list should be developed that
would include all current research staff and students. This list
could be used to define training requirements. Steve Wofsy stated
that if he had an up-to-date list of the training sessions that the
people in his group attended, he would make certain that any lack of
training would be rectified. Some felt one central list of trained
people would be unmanageable; however, it was suggested that a PC be
purchased just for this purpose. One or several database(s) could be
managed by an intern or undergraduate.
Lenny stated he would talk to Dr. Gold about the feasibility of
developing such lists. He will report back to the committee in
October 1998.
5. Disposal of Hazardous Waste Training: Update
- (Lenny)
We are basically in good shape. Only four people have not taken the
training. The yearly certification of some of those who have taken
the online training has run out. They need to retake
the refresher.
6. Report from Environmental Health and Safety - (Peter
Bochnak/Henry Littleboy)
Chemistry evacuation: Henry commented on the recent chemistry
evacuation. The label on the bottle was blown away when the bottle
exploded, and the Fire Dept. could not quickly determine the contents
of the bottle. Apparently the Fire Dept. demands to see an MSDS
sheet and labeled container. Because the Fire Dept. could not find
the bottle label, they prevented the people involved in the accident
from leaving for the hospital. They were detained
for 30 minutes.
We are working very closely with the Fire Department to settle this
issue. Henry stated strongly that this situation
must be resolved.
7. Old Business
Mass General Hospital was inspected recently by EPA. People in labs
had to answer questions about safety procedures. Our workers need to
be prepared to do the same. We should review the material on the
green posters-apparently they focused on that. They looked at every
bottle and took pictures of lab areas.
8. New Business:
NEXT MEETING: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 at 12:00 noon
Location: possibly Legal Sea Food